Just before we begin, we wish to present this simple statistical analysis of FRAUDS UPON THE COURT being a highly popular issue, resulting from an SEO code search as listed, published or alleged in the United States and abroad: as you can check for yourself here by clicking: GOOGLE There are 4,060,000,000.00 (Four Billion Sixty Millions sites) on Google alone, that address the subject of FRAUDS UPON THE COURT. Now, here are the alleged TEN FRAUDS UPON THE COURT in Florida: ALLEGED FRAUD #1) UNAUTHORIZED APPEARANCE OF WITHDRAWN and TERMINATED ATTORNEY (POST SUMMARY JUDGEMENT) Are you safe talking to your lawyer? ALLEGED FRAUD #2) SUMMARY JUDGEMENT ENTERED WITH DISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS (PRE-SUMMARY JUDGEMENT) Are all judgements right in your sight? ALLEGED FRAUD #3) THE TRIAL COURT ABORTED TWO SCHEDULED TRIALS WITH FINAL ORDERS DEFIANTLY (PRE-SUMMARY JUDGEMENT) Wouldn't it be easier to have a jury trial in 2007 than to drag this case to where it is now and still be unjust and unfair? ALLEGED FRAUD #4) COMMISSIONER'S INVOLVEMENT AND OMISSION (NEW EVIDENCE PRE-SUMMARY JUDGEMENT) None is above the law. So, why are some exempted from facing the law? ALLEGED FRAUD #5) THE DISTRICT COURT NEGATED EXTORTION BY A MINOR GOVERNMENT TO EXTINCTION (NEW EVIDENCE PRE-SUMMARY JUDGEMENT) We understand EXTORTION TO MEAN as defined by FINDLAW "the gaining of property or money by almost any kind of force, or threat of 1) violence, 2) property damage, 3) harm to reputation, or 4) unfavorable government action. While usually viewed as a form of theft/larceny, extortion differs from robbery in that the threat in question does not pose an imminent physical danger to the victim." That is exactly what the Walton County did to African American plaintiffs. Is this fair or unjust? ALLEGED FRAUD #6) THE TRIAL COURT NEGATED THE RESCISSION OF A PREDICTABLE ESTOPPEL LETTER TO EXTINCTION (PRE-SUMMARY JUDGEMENT) while the 11 Circuit Appeal court stated to our understanding that "Although there was UNFORTUNATE CONFUSION with respect to the initial permission of the wall and the later withdrawal thereof" Meaning, the Walton County broke their words to the detriment of the African American plaintiffs. We beseech the High Court with its national jurisdiction to intervene and restore justice for the public in America. Can a minor Government lie to citizens overtly and expect to be right in the end? ALLEGED FRAUD #7) THE TRIAL COURT NEGATED ALL DISCRIMINATION IN THE CASE TO EXTINCTION. (PRE-SUMMARY JUDGEMENT) The lower court stated in writing that the area where that case took place was "HISTORICALLY RACIALLY SEGREGATED" then, negated all racial segregation to extinction as though the sole African American real estate developers on the gulf of Mexico in Florida, had no rights to be members of the "Protected Class." That's not right. In our opinion, the Supreme Court and the President of the United States must hear this expeditiously to restore the level playing field and the check in balances our democratic system can deliver. Don't you think? ALLEGED FRAUD #8) THE FEDERAL COURT NEGATED ALL TAKINGS TO EXTINCTION WHETHER TEMPORARY, PERMANENT , REGULATORY, OR PHYSICAL (PRE-SUMMARY JUDGEMENT). The properties of the African Americans were lost through foreclosures and Bankruptcies to their demise. Shouldn't there be fair accountability here? ALLEGED FRAUD #9) PREJUDICIAL OVERSIGHT OF NEARLY ONE YEAR by THE TRIAL COURT, NULLIFYING POSSIBLE INJUNCTIVE RELIEF IN 2006/2007. (PRE-SUMMARY JUDGEMENT) The Court through the Honorable Judge apologized in writing for wasting nearly one year with this case with nothing done on the record. Then, in a surprising move, declared that plaintiffs' side has "wasted scarce judicial resources." This is outrageous, to say the least, in plaintiffs' view. Would you accept this from the court? You may be next. Watch out! ALLEGED FRAUD #10) REFUSAL TO USE RULE 60 DESPITE NEW EVIDENCES, OVERSIGHT, and ABORTION OF TWO JURY TRIALS (POST SUMMARY JUDGEMENT) P.S. OVERSIGHT OF NEARLY ONE YEAR NULLIFYING POSSIBLE INJUNCTIVE RELIEF IN 2006/2007, WHILE REFUSING RULE 60 to REOPEN THE CASE in 2011. After all the nine frauds above, the trial court has now refused to reopen the case and is demanding that African American Plaintiffs pay attorney cost to the defendants. We need the intervention of the Supreme Court now for order and equity. May plaintiffs find favor in the eyes of the high authorities at the Supreme Court that holds jurisdiction over the entire United States and for good cause. Plaintiffs believe that these individuals possess enough integrity and are capable to handle FRAUDS UPON THE COURT like the Honorables John G. Roberts, Chief Justice, Samuel Alito, Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan, Anthony Kennedy, Antonin Scalia, Sonia Sotomayor, Clarence Thomas. THIS IS UNJUST AND YOUR TURN MAY BE NEXT. SO, VOTE AGAINST INJUSTICE. THIS IS SERIOUS. Sony Roy Plaintiff http://0541e0a4.ultrafiles.net Labels: ALLEGED TEN FRAUDS UPON THE COURT, BLACKS LOCKING ARMS, liberty or death, TEN ALLEGED FRAUDS UPON THE COURT, your turn next | 6:42:00 PM | by BAFU USA |
OFFICERS OF THE COURT, BE TRUE
Friday, December 2, 2011
ALLEGED TEN FRAUDS UPON THE COURT
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)